Collect. Czech. Chem. Commun.
2005, 70, 1196-1224
https://doi.org/10.1135/cccc20051196
Dipole Oscillator Strength Distributions and Properties for Methanol, Ethanol and Propan-1-ol and Related Dispersion Energies
Ashok Kumara, B. L. Jhanwarb and William J. Meathc,*
a Department of Physics, Ch. Charan Singh University, Meerut, 250004, India
b Department of Computer Application, Mody Institute of Technology and Science, Lakshmangarth, Distt. Sikar, Rajasthan, 332311, India
c Department of Chemistry, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, N6A 5B7, Canada
References
1. Can. J. Chem. 1984, 62, 373.
< B. L., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1139/v84-066>
2. Can. J. Phys. 1977, 55, 2080.
< G. D., Meath W. J., MacDonald J. C. F., Dawson D. J.: https://doi.org/10.1139/p77-252>
3a. Phys. Rev. 1931, 37, 1425.
< H.: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.37.1425>
3b. Phys. Rev. 1939, 56, 1000.
< H.: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.56.1000>
4a. Proc. Phys. Soc., London 1957, 70, 802.
< A., Lynn N.: https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1298/70/11/303>
4b. Proc. Phys. Soc., London 1958, 72, 1053.
< A., Kingston A. E.: https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1328/72/6/314>
4c. Proc. Phys. Soc., London 1959, 73, 455.
< A., Kingston A. E.: https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1328/73/3/312>
4d. Proc. Phys. Soc., London 1961, 78, 607.
< A., Kingston A. E.: https://doi.org/10.1088/0370-1328/78/4/316>
5. Theor. Chem.: Adv. Perspect. 1975, 1, 117.
< P. J., Barker J. A.: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-681901-4.50009-X>
6. J. Chem. Phys. 1985, 83, 70; and references therein.
< A., Fairly G. R. G., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.449794>
7. Can. J. Chem. 1988, 66, 615.
< R. J., Kumar A., Thuraisingham R. A., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1139/v88-105>
8. Chem. Phys. 1992, 167, 349.
< G. R., Chan W. F., Cooper G., Brion C. E.: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0104(92)80208-D>
9. Chem. Phys. 2002, 282, 419.
< R., Brion C. E.: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0104(02)00722-X>
10. J. Chem. Phys. 1978, 68, 1426.
< D. J., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.435963>
11. Mol. Phys. 1978, 35, 747.
< D. J., Proctor T. R., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268977800100561>
12. Mol. Phys. 1980, 41, 1061.
< B. L., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978000103781>
13a. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1968, 40, 441.
< U., Cooper J. W.: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.40.441>
13b. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1969, 41, 724.
< U., Cooper J. W.: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.41.724>
14. Adv. Quantum Chem. 1964, 1, 255.
< J. O., Byers Brown W., Epstein S. T.: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-3276(08)60381-0>
15. Mol. Phys. 1976, 33, 1155.
< G. D., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268977700100991>
16. Hirschfelder J. O., Curtis C. F., Bird R. B.: Molecular Theory of Gases and Liquids. Wiley, New York 1954.
17. Z. Phys. 1930, 60, 491.
< R., London F.: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01341258>
18. J. Chem. Phys. 1943, 11, 299.
< P. M., Teller E.: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1723844>
19. Proc. Phys. Math. Soc. Jpn. 1943, 17, 629.
Y.:
20. Rev. Mod. Phys. 1971, 43, 297.
< M.: https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.43.297>
21a. Radiat. Res. 1975, 63, 64.
< G. D., Meath W. J., MacDonald J. C. F., Dawson D. J.: https://doi.org/10.2307/3574308>
21b. Radiat. Res. 1977, 70, 284.
< G. D., Meath W. J., MacDonald J. C. F., Dawson D. J.: https://doi.org/10.2307/3574587>
22. J. Chem. Phys. 1970, 53, 2783.
< H. L.: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1674403>
23. J. Chem. Phys. 1970, 53, 2792.
< H. L., Herschbach D. R.: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1674404>
24. J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 76, 3057.
< C., Scoles G., Marchetti S., Zen M., Thakkar A. J.: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.443345>
25. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 80, 3726.
< K. T., Toennies J. P.: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.447150>
26. J. Mol. Struct. 1991, 226, 1; and references therein.
< W. J., Koulis M.: https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-1280(91)80002-P>
27. Mol. Phys. 2001, 99, 991; and references therein.
< A. K., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970010034559>
28. J. Chem. Phys. 2001, 114, 8836.
< M. P., Wheatley R. J.: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1367379>
29. J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 2002, 591, 67.
< M. P., Wheatley R. J.: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-1280(02)00211-7>
30. Int. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2004, 23, 151.
< R. J., Tulegenov A. S., Bichoutskaia E.: https://doi.org/10.1080/014423504200207772>
31. Mol. Phys. 1986, 57, 755.
< J. A.: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978600100541>
32. Mol. Phys. 1984, 52, 225; and references therein.
< W. J., Aziz R. A.: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978400101171>
33. Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. A 1936, 4, 675.
< K. L.: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03045345>
34. Bethe H. A., Salpeter E. E.: Quantum Mechanics of One- and Two-Electron Atoms. Academic Press, New York 1957.
35. Int. J. Quantum Chem., Quantum Chem. Symp. 1990, 24, 501.
< W. J., Kumar A.: https://doi.org/10.1002/qua.560382450>
36. Theor. Chim. Acta 1992, 82, 131.
< A., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01113134>
37. Chem. Phys. 1994, 189, 467.
< A., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0104(94)00309-2>
38. J. Chem. Phys. 1996, 105, 4927.
< A., Meath W. J., Bundgen P., Thakkar A. J.: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.472344>
39. Mol. Phys. 1997, 90, 721.
< P., Thakkar A. J., Kumar A., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268979709482658>
40a. Can. J. Phys. 1985, 63, 417.
< A., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1139/p85-065>
40b. Can. J. Phys. 1985, 63, 1616.
A., Meath W. J.:
41. Mol. Phys. 1992, 75, 311.
< A., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268979200100251>
42. Can. J. Chem. 1993, 71, 341.
< G. R., Chan W. F., Cooper G., Brion C. E., Kumar A., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1139/v93-051>
43. Can. J. Chem. 1994, 72, 529.
< G. R., Chan W. F., Cooper G., Brion C. E., Kumar A., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1139/v94-077>
44. Mol. Phys. 1997, 90, 389.
< A., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268979709482619>
45. J. Mol. Struct. (THEOCHEM) 2002, 591, 91.
< A.: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-1280(02)00213-0>
46. Mol. Phys. 2002, 100, 3271.
< M., Kumar A., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268970210162682>
47. Chem. Phys. 2003, 286, 227.
< A., Kumar M., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0104(02)00926-6>
48. Mol. Phys. 2003, 101, 1535.
< A., Kumar M., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1080/0026897031000092986>
49. Can. J. Phys. 1981, 59, 185.
< B. L., Meath W. J., MacDonald J. C. F.: https://doi.org/10.1139/p81-023>
50. Chem. Phys. 1982, 67, 185.
< B. L., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0104(82)85033-7>
51. Chem. Phys. 1997, 223, 59.
< T. N., Cann N. M., Cooper G., Brion C. E.: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-0104(97)00145-6>
52. Chem. Phys. 1993, 177, 217.
< G. R., Chan W. F., Cooper G., Brion C. E.: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0104(93)80191-B>
53. Washburn E. W.: International Critical Tables, Vol. 7, p. 2. McGraw-Hill, New York 1930.
54. Mol. Phys. 1980, 39, 1055.
< G. D., Meath W. J., MacDonald J. C. F., Dawson D. J.: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978000100901>
55. Meath W. J., Margoliash D. J., Jhanwar B. L., Koide A., Zeiss G. D. in: Intermolecular Forces (B. Pullman, Ed.), p. 101. Reidel, Dordrecht 1981.
56. Radiat. Res. 1986, 106, 288.
< B. L., Meath W. J., MacDonald J. C. F.: https://doi.org/10.2307/3576736>
57. Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1982, 33, 1189.
< S. M., Berger M. J.: https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-708X(82)90244-7>
58. Thompson T. J.: Effect of Chemical Structure on Stopping Powers for High-Energy Protons. Report UCRL-1910. University of California, Radiation Laboratory, Berkeley 1952.
59. ICRU – Stopping Powers for Electrons and Positrons. Report 37. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda 1984.
60. Phys. Med. Biol. 1982, 27, 449.
< H.: https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/27/3/014>
61. Phys. Rev. A 1983, 28, 3212.
< G., Krotz R., Lohmer K., Neuwirth W.: https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.28.3212>
62. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B 1985, 12, 84.
< D. I.: https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-583X(85)90705-0>
63. J. Chem. Phys. 1967, 47, 1271.
< R. E., Epstein S. T., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1712079>
64. Chem. Phys. 1984, 91, 411.
< A., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1016/0301-0104(84)80073-7>
65. Mol. Phys. 1985, 54, 823.
< A., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978500103191>
66. J. Comput. Methods, Sci. Eng. 2004, 4, 307.
A., Meath W. J.:
67. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 94, 1295.
< M. A.: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.460039>
68. J. Chem. Phys. 1991, 94, 1288.
< M. A.: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.460038>
69. J. Phys. Chem. 1989, 93, 7594.
< M. A.: https://doi.org/10.1021/j100359a015>
70. J. Chem. Phys. 2004, 121, 7711.
< S. M., Haley T. P.: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1795652>
71. J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 20.
< U., Siebers J. G., Wheatley R. J.: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.475361>
72. Quoted (private communication) from the work of B. L. Jhanwar and W. J. Meath (unpublished work) by M. A. Spackman67.
73. J. Chem. Phys. 2002, 116, 1397.
< M. P., Wheatley R. J., Harvey A. H.: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1421065>
74. Can. J. Chem. 1998, 76, 483.
< S. A. C., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjc-76-4-483>
75. Mol. Phys. 1980, 41, 249.
< F., Thomas G. F., Meath W. J.: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978000102751>
76. Mol. Phys. 1980, 39, 407.
< F., van Dijk G., van der Avoird A.: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268978000100341>
77. J. Chem. Phys. 1980, 71, 6107.
< R. M., van der Avoird A.: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.439067>
78. Mol. Phys. 1993, 80, 533.
< H., Wormer P. E. S., Thakkar A. J.: https://doi.org/10.1080/00268979300102451>
79. Twenty pseudo-states for each of the alcohols are available from the authors: [email protected].